Given the cost (both monetary and time) of running longitudinal studies, do you think that it would be better to set a date in the future to 'definitively' answer this question of the salutary/pernicious effects of screen time? Additionally, how do we get multiple researchers in these areas to adopt the same dependent measures so that meta-analyses can be properly conducted?
Is there a need for a 'standardised' framework (just like in medicine) to guide researchers here to avoid duplication of effort?
I loved your post. Thank you for this
I really like the way you think. Makes perfect sense!
Great read as usual.
Given the cost (both monetary and time) of running longitudinal studies, do you think that it would be better to set a date in the future to 'definitively' answer this question of the salutary/pernicious effects of screen time? Additionally, how do we get multiple researchers in these areas to adopt the same dependent measures so that meta-analyses can be properly conducted?
Is there a need for a 'standardised' framework (just like in medicine) to guide researchers here to avoid duplication of effort?
This is brilliant, thank you. Would there be a follow up for the 2+ age group?